|

Since our last review of
a Glacier Bay, Company President Larry Graff asked me
to have a look at some of the new improvements that he's
made across the board on his line of twenty six footers.
Larry didn't mind telling me that he was disappointed
with my review, suggesting that I was a little hard on
his boats. I had to agree because the truth was that I
am a bit prejudiced toward mono hulls for some very good
reasons. Secondly, the last time we did a sea trial,
the seas were far too big and steep for us to be able
to evaluate the boat fully.
This time we had conditions that were
a lot better for getting an all-around sense of how this
boat performs. Namely, two foot very confused seas out
in the Stream. Larry points out that he's made some refinements
to the hulls. These involve angling the chines down a
bit and reshaping the spray rails to reduce spray. In
the stern section he, uh, well, take a look at the photo
below because I'm not that skilled a technical writer
that I can adequately explain what he did there. Whatever
it was, it seems to have resulted in some great improvements
in boat handling.
NOTE: There are four different models
built around the same 26 foot hull. Our test boat was
the 2640 Renegade. It was very light on fuel and therefore
a bit bow heavy.
Other improvements include installing
two frames in the hull sides to strengthen the gunwales
which, I could see by giving it the old press with your
feet test, did indeed increase the strength a lot. The
width of the gunwale is also substantially wider. Cancel
that former complaint. Some new hardware consisting of
some great chromed bronze hatch dogs (latches for you
landlubbers), along with a new type of plastic inspection
ports that are both much larger and far better designed
than the previous ones.
I liked the layout of this boat from
the moment I saw it. What we got here is all the spaciousness
of a pontoon boat without the accompanying unseaworthiness.
The L-shaped lounge set forward is what makes it, freeing
up a largish aft cockpit deck for water sports or, if
you so desire, you can add additional seating such as
folding chairs. But to be able to move around some uncluttered
deck space was like pure heaven to me. I detest cramped
and cluttered decks. Most small boats are too cramped
with too much seating, and remind me of what it's like
flying coach on a commercial airline.
The console behind the lounge is also
very nice, particularly since there is enough surface
space there to actually be useful, unlike so many boats
of its size. Call it a bar area if you like, I'd probably
use it as a work bench. What really made me gasp was the
head compartment. It's unexpected, to say the least. One
thing you'll notice is that here we have a 26 foot boat,
but essentially no cabin -- except for the head space
in the port hull. Is it weird? Is it cool. I'm not sure,
but there is also a lot of dry storage space there.
 |
| Our
sea trial conditions. |
Overall, I thought this was a wonderful
open boat for the Florida market, and I'm sure that that's
what Larry had in mind. It's great for waterway cocktail
barging, or a quick blast over to the islands or down
to the keys, and will get you there fast without breaking
the bank. You will not, however, be sleeping aboard should
you decide to overnight, unless it's under the stars.
Getting back to performance, our demo
driver Len Renne jammed the throttles forward and stormed
out the inlet at 26 knots into a tide rip. I won't say
it was smooth riding, for no boat is smooth under those
conditions, as shown above, but the way this boat
handles waves head-on is impressive. For reasons I haven't
had time to analyze, the bow does not lift as high as
you would expect with a monohull. This reduces slamming
considerably. This boat did slam on occasion, but most
of the time it was more like a hard landing than a flat
out belly flopper. Were the seas running from a consistent
direction, I'm sure that it would handle a two foot chop
superbly. Yet it did just fine with waves popping up from
every direction.
Just so you understand wave height, keep
in mind what a two foot high speed bump in the road would
be like. Two feet is a big wave for a 26 footer, nearly
the distance from the water line to the gunwale. I still
find it hard to describe the handling characteristics
of this boat. It's just plain different, but more pleasant
than a typical monohull once you get over the fact that
it doesn't behave like a monohull.
Off-the-wind handling was superb. As
I said in my previous piece, operating a catamaran takes
some getting used to. Under these sea conditions, the
hulls tracked very nicely. Zooming along at full speed
I was urged to throw the boat into a hard turn. As I used
to do this as a kid just for kicks, I was leery at first
but finally gave the wheel a big twist. Frankly, I found
it hard to believe that a cat could slide into a turn,
but it did so nicely.
We took very little spray over the bow,
though it has an interesting tendency to shoot a very,
very fine mist of spray over the bow. The space between
the hulls is so narrow that waves do not smack against
the web as the usually do on larger cats, but at slower
speeds, say around 12-14 knots, it will shoot a geyser
of water forward at times.
Rock-N-Roll Department: We hear a lot
of talk about how much boats roll. It seems a lot of people
are seeking the illusive "stable platform."
But there is no such thing, all boats roll, the only question
is in what manner. Bringing the boat to a stop on
various points of the compass we found out. In terms of
degrees of roll, this rolls much less than any comparable
mono hull. But there is a great trade off for the speed
of movement, for while it rolls less, it rolls much faster.
Trying to stand up is no easier on a catamaran than it
is on any monohull. The very rapid motion throws you off
your feet regardless. If you want to go to sea, you just
have to live with that.
The key to success of this design, at
least in my mind, is the closeness of the two hulls. One
could argue that this is not really a cat, but a slotted
hull, and you wouldn't be too far off the mark. You could
also argue that you loose a lot of hull interior space,
which is certainly true. You can complain that the gunwales
are too high, and that is also true. But in my view, all
of these are tradeoffs for the superior performance. Then,
again, counterbalancing the scale you also get that huge
cockpit area which is facilitated by a rectangular
deck area that does not come to a point on one end.
 |
| Helm
console is hinged and swings out for easy access. |
I also had a hard time getting used to
the amazing quietness of the Honda 130 four stroke engines.
They are so quiet that the sound they emit is more like
a moderate hum; no roaring and we could even carry on
a normal conversation without shouting. Without engine
noise, this also gives you a new take on the perception
of speed. I quickly learned that in docking, I normally
rely upon engine noise to tell me what the engines are
doing. Lacking that noise, you quickly discover that on
docking you have a new learning experience on your hands.
Fortunately, I managed not to crash into the dock. The
wide spacing of the engines gives much better control
than any other twin outboard boat where the engines are
set as close as they can get.
When it came time to load back up on
the trailer, I took one look at the boat, and then at
the trailer and thought, uh oh, this is going to be a
tough job. Then Len hopped in the boat and literally drove
it ALL the way up onto the trailer. The trailer, you see,
has teflon skids on it. The only problem here is to avoid
driving the boat on top of your vehicle. It's almost too
easy.
Whatever you may think of cats, their
low power speed performance is undeniable. Two hundred-sixty
horsepower pushes this boat to 31.7 kts in rough water.
The speed range obtained is as follows:
| 3000 RPM |
16.8 kts. |
| 3600 |
19.8 |
| 4000 |
23.6 |
| 4600 |
28.6 |
| 5400 |
31.7 |
These speeds were taken in water so rough that it was
difficult to even see the readouts, so these speeds are
approximate and will likely be better in calmer water.
Zero to full speed is attained in approximately 15 seconds.
Now, let's talk about quality. It's pretty
clear to me that Larry Graff cares about quality. He hasn't
futzed around with foam cores and other so-called "high
tech" stuff trying to save money or weight. They're
laid up of plain old woven roving that, mercifully, we
all know how well that material performs. No high tech
mystery materials here to worry about. These boats are
actually fairly heavy for their size, which contributes
greatly to seakeeping. The bottoms go from 3/4" of
solid glass tapering up
to 1/4" on the hull sides. When I banged on the sides
hard with my fist, it was my hand that got hurt. Very
solid indeed. There is Coremat in the sides, but when
the builder takes the time to thoroughly saturate the
material, this stuff gets very hard. And the deck is attached
with screws into an aluminum backing plate. Due to the
design, it's not possible to glass the deck on.
 |
| Deck join as seen
from inside. |
The framing system is something to behold.
I was shown drawings of it since you can't really see
the whole framing system. Larry didn't want me to publish
the drawing because he considers this proprietary. If
the competition wants to copy his methods, they'll just
have to buy one of his boats and cut it apart.
There is storage space galore on this
boat, most of it in under-hatch bins. There is an insulated
cooler in the hatch built around the helm chair, and two
monster hatches in the forward cockpit. Speaking of which,
while there are seat cushions up there, guests will be
actually sitting on the deck. It seems designed here for
bone or Tarpon fishing.
Rod racks are built into the starboard
gunwale, and the gunwale width has been substantially
increased, to give an excellent foot cove for the fisherman.
The one drawback for the fisherman, of course, is the
very high gunwale height.
In the complaint and carping department,
I found the helm chair to be too close to the wheel and
the sharp edges of seat were cutting into the backs of
my legs. There were also some pretty sharp edges on parts
of the windshield that Larry said he'd address. Then it
was found that a large amount of water was puddling on
the deck under the port side seating/bar module, but we
couldn't figure out why, or where it was coming from.
The only serious design complaint I had,
one which I suggested to Larry that he consider for future
modifications, is about the integral motor mount platform.
In the Florida market, where boaters spend a lot of time
IN and not just ON the water, most platform extensions
are designed as swim platforms. This one is not, for the
hull sides extend all the way aft, and it has fairly deep
wells on each side that prevent it from effectively being
used as a swim platform. A well designed platform extension
is a major selling feature in the Florida market, that
this boat lacks. It needs a flat deck back there with
no wings on the sides.
There are other standard goodies I took
note of like chrome bronze through hulls ABOVE THE WATERLINE,
stainless pop up cleats for tying off fenders, recessed
hatch hinges, bolted on, not screwed. Sump wells with
bilge pumps in the large deck boxes. Except for the inspection
ports, all hardware is stainless, no plastic junk. The
windshield is all glass, even the cured sections, unlike
most which have plastic.
The mold fairing is not flawless, but
darn close. The detail work is quite good. Overall, I
thought this to be a well above average quality boat.
If you're interested in catamarans and haven't looked
at or taken a test run in a Glacier Bay, you should put
this one at the top of your list to check out. Even if
your not interested in cats, this boat may change your
thinking about catamarans. It certainly changed mine,
though to be sure, all catamarans do not perform as well
as this one by a long shot.
Test boat provided by:
Seven Seas Yacht Sales
1500 W. Broward Blvd.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
954-463-8143
| These are
"reviews", not surveys, and bear no resemblance to our survey
reports. We do not publish
the results of the surveys that we perform. Please note that the purpose
of these reviews is educational, to help you discern the differences in
quality among boats generally. They are not offered as a means to help
you evaluate any particular boat builder. We have no other reviews than
those posted. |
|